K.R.S. KRS 503.030  Kentucky Justifiable Homicide Necessity KY

K.R.S. KRS 503.030 When a person uses Deadly Force in Self Defense the two civil and criminal defenses of Justification (Justifiable Homicide) and Necessity or Choice of Evils become the criminal and civil defenses to liability.   KRS 503.030 is the definition section of the Kentucky Code on Choice of Evils often called the doctrine of necessity and the use of deadly force in self defense. 

 
 
 

 

Nick C. Thompson JD

800 Stone Creek Parkway Suite 6

Louisville, Kentucky

40223

(502)429-0057

Choice of Evils K.R.S. KRS 503.030  Kentucky Justifiable Homicide Necessity KY

Download our Self Defense and how to Carry Concealed Manual.   Visit our Law website Bankruptcy-Divorce.com for manuals on Bankruptcy Divorce Lemon Auto and other legal topics. Remember bookmark or link to our websites.   

KRS 503.030

Justification is a defense only under this statute when and act was intentional and non fatal.  Notice that there is no justification for an intentional homicide under this section. Instead you must use Justification 503.050 if a homicide was intentional. 

In any prosecution for an offense Justification as defined under the 503 chapter is a defense. 

Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. 501.070-.090 & 503.030 list mistake, duress, intoxication and justification as defenses.  Generally the choice of evils argument is that I assaulted the person so that someone would not die.  The defense is a weighing of the possible harms that allows an assault to prevent a homicide or the threat of a firearm to prevent an actual assault.   

503.030 Choice of evils.

(1) Unless inconsistent with the ensuing sections of this code defining justifiable use of physical force or with some other provisions of law, conduct which would otherwise constitute an offense is justifiable when the defendant believes it to be necessary to avoid an imminent public or private injury greater than the injury which is sought to be prevented by the statute defining the offense charged, except that no justification can exist under this section for an intentional homicide.

(2) When the defendant believes that conduct which would otherwise constitute an offense is necessary for the purpose described in subsection (1), but is wanton or reckless in having such belief, or when the defendant is wanton or reckless in bringing about a situation requiring the conduct described in subsection (1), the justification afforded by this section is unavailable in a prosecution for any offense for which wantonness or recklessness, as the case may be, suffices to establish culpability.

Link to K.R.S. 503.030

Every situation is different this is for information only and this is not legal advice.