Gourko v. US 153 U.S. 183

Gourko v. US 153 U.S. 183 in a unanimous Supreme Court verdict stated that arming yourself is not a presumption for Murder.  Instead persons have a right to arm themselves especially when they believe that their lives may be in danger.  Gourko v US repeats and cites the principles of Gourko that firearms are used by the public in lawful self defense.      

 
 
 

 

Nick C. Thompson JD

800 Stone Creek Parkway Suite 6

Louisville, Kentucky

40223

(502)429-0057

 

Gourko v. US 153 U.S. 183 (1894) Justifiable Homicide

 

Download our Self Defense and how to Carry Concealed Manual.   Visit our Law website Bankruptcy-Divorce.com for manuals on Bankruptcy Divorce Lemon Auto and other legal topics. Remember bookmark or link to our websites.   

The case of  Gourko v. US 153 U.S. 183 (1894)

The case of Gourko v. US is one of the first cases on self defense. Gourko and the companion case of Thompson stands for the principle merely carrying a firearm is not evidence of the intent to commit murder or manslaughter.  Instead the court expects people to arm themselves when threatened.  In this case Gourko, was threatened by the Carbos who weighed over 200 Gourko weighed only 135 and was peaceful.  Gourko armed himself in light of the Threat. 

 

This case was ruled upon the issues of: Intent and retreat

 

Similar cases on Intent were Thompson, Allen and Wallace on intent and Beard, Rowe, Alberty and Brown on Retreat. 

 

On the issue of intent. 

 

Every situation is different however and this is for information only.  This is not legal advice